首页资讯作为艺术行动的美——一种生活美学的视角

作为艺术行动的美——一种生活美学的视角

来源：泰然健康网时间：2025年09月01日 16:34

关于美学学科的合法性，目前学界有两种意见。取消主义美学认为“美”是一个先行设定出来的“超级概念”，没有一个“超级事实”与其对应，犯了形而上学本质主义的错误，因此美学学科并不合法；形而上学美学则坚持形而上学的阵地，用康德美学的“合目的性”来解释美这个概念，由此认为美学学科具有合乎理想价值的合法性。本文以为，由于形而上学美学的理论自闭性，不可能让审美活动具有现实的超越性价值；而取消主义美学最大的问题是在正确指出“超级概念”虚妄性的同时，没有充分估计到其中包含的目的性价值。当然，上述两种意见并非没有融通之处，即将美理解为某种艺术行动，不过本文认为，这种艺术行动不仅是超越性的，而且应该携带日常生活这幅肉身。

Abstract

There are two ideas about the legitimacy of aesthetics as a discipline. Aesthetics of Elimination claims that beauty is an a prior super-concept which, absent of a corresponding super-reality, falls into the abyss of metaphysical essentialism. Hence, aesthetics is not a legitimate discipline. Metaphysical Aesthetics holds that beauty should be interpreted through Kantian purposiveness of aesthetics and claims the legitimacy of the discipline of aesthetics in its ideal-confirming value. This paper argues that metaphysical aesthetics, due to its theoretically self-enclosed nature, cannot allow aesthetic activities to take on realistic transcendent value. Aesthetics of Elimination, however, has its own major problem. While it correctly points out the illusionary nature of super-concept, it has failed to fully acknowledge its value of purposiveness. Between the two ideas in question, there is certainly a common ground, which is to take beauty as an action of art. This action, this paper concludes, not only contains transcendent value but also carries with it the mortal body of everyday life.

关键词

艺术行动 / 生活美学 / 超越性 / 肉身{{custom_keyword}} /

Key words

action of art /aesthetics of life /transcendence /mortal body{{custom_keyword}} /

张宝贵.

0" m-for-array="{{authorList_cn}}" m-for-val="custom_author" m-for-index="custom_index">0">, {{custom_author.name_cn}}等.

作为艺术行动的美——一种生活美学的视角[J]. 文艺理论研究, 2014, 34(3): 57-63

ZHANG Bao-Gui.

0" m-for-array="{{authorList_en}}" m-for-val="custom_author" m-for-index="custom_index">0">, {{custom_author.name_en}}et al.

Beauty as an Action of Art: from the Aspect of Aesthetics of Life[J]. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, 2014, 34(3): 57-63

参考文献

亚里士多德：《诗学》，陈中梅译。北京：商务印书馆，2002年。
[Aristotle. Poetics. Trans. Chen Zhongmei. Beijing: Commercial Press, 2002.]
Bacon, Francis. Advancement of Learning and the New Atlantis. London New York and Toronto : Oxford University Press, 1951.
- - -. The New Organon. Ed. Lisa Jardine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
邓晓芒：《冥河的摆渡者》。昆明：云南人民出版社，1997年。
[Deng, Xiaomang. The Ferryman on Styx. Kunming: Yunnan Renmin Publishing House, 1997.]
Dewey, John. Art as Experience. New York: Minton Balch & Company, 1934.
- - -. Experience and Nature. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company,1994.
刘旭光：“保卫美，保卫美学”，《文艺争鸣》 11（2012）：6-11。
[Liu, Xuguang. “Defending Beauty, Defending Aesthetics.” Forum on Literature and Art 4 (2012): 6-11.]
鲁迅：“文艺与革命”，《语丝》 16（1928）：41-43。
[Lu, Xun. “Literature, Art and Revolution.” Yusi 16 (1928): 41-43.]
马克思：“关于费尔巴哈的提纲”，《马克思恩格斯文集》第一卷。北京：人民出版社，2009年。
[Marx, Karl. “Theses on Feuerbach.” Collected Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Vol. 1. Beijing: Renmin Publishing House, 2009.]
柏拉图：《柏拉图文艺对话录》，朱光潜译。北京：人民文学出版社，1963年。
[Plato. The Dialogues on Literature and Art. Trans. Zhu Guangqian. Beijing: Renmin Literature Publishing House, 1963.]
Quine, W. V. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press, 1969.
索绪尔：《普通语言学教程》，高名凯译。北京：商务印书馆，1999年。
[Saussure. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Gao Mingkai. Beijing: Commercial Press, 1999.]
Tatarkiewicz, Wladyslaw. A History of Six Ideas: an Essay in Aesthetics. Polish: Scientific Publishers Warszawa, 1980.
Adorno,Theodor, W. Aesthetic Theory. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. London and New York: Continuum, 2002.
王峰：“美学是一门错误的学科”，《清华大学学报》 4（2009）：81-89。
[Wang, Feng.“Aesthetics is a False Subject.” Journal of Tsinghua University 4 (2009): 81-89.]
——：“美：一个被毁弃的盟约”，《文艺争鸣》 11（2012）：12-17。
[- - -. “Beauty: an Alliance Destroyed.” Forum on Literature and Art 11 (2012): 12-17.]
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.
----. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E.M. Anscombe. Basil: Blackwell Ltd, 1986.
维特根斯坦：《逻辑哲学论》，郭英译。北京：商务印书馆，1992年。
[Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logical-Philosophicus. Trans. Guo Yin. Beijing: Commercial Press, 1992. ]